{"id":16,"date":"2016-02-09T20:07:00","date_gmt":"2016-02-09T20:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/192.231.106.19\/blog\/?p=16"},"modified":"2019-07-06T06:15:32","modified_gmt":"2019-07-06T06:15:32","slug":"why-david-should-no-longer-be-used","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/?p=16","title":{"rendered":"Why DAVID should no longer be used?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h5 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>[This is an old blog written on Tuesday, February 9, 2016]<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n<p>National Cancer Institute&#8217;s&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/david.ncifcrf.gov\/\">DAVID<\/a>&nbsp;provides a set of popular bioinformatics tools that help biologists make sense of a list of gene.&nbsp; However, evidences show that DAVID has not bee updated since January 2010 (Jan 27, 2010 according to&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/DAVID\">Wikipedia<\/a>)!&nbsp; The&nbsp;<em><strong>six-year old backend database<\/strong><\/em>&nbsp;makes DAVID an inadequate tool for our bioinformatics analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On the DAVID home page, it shows the most recent DAVID version is 6.7, released on Jan 2010.&nbsp; &nbsp;Visit&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/david.ncifcrf.gov\/forum\/\">DAVID Forum<\/a>, we can see DAVID team has not answered a single user post for the past six years.&nbsp; As a user concluded on the forum,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/david.ncifcrf.gov\/forum\/viewtopic.php?f=3&amp;t=1224&amp;p=3097&amp;hilit=died&amp;sid=55761a726eb5231fc4154522f9486556#p3097\">&#8220;DAVID Died&#8221;<\/a>!Today we would like to systematically check how updated the backend database is behind DAVID.First, we took all latest human Entrez Gene IDs (59803 in total) and tested DAVID&#8217;s ID Conversion tool.&nbsp; DAVID only recognized 58% and missed 42%.&nbsp; As shown in the bar graph below, DAVID essentially missed 87% non-coding RNAs, as ncRNA became a hot topic only within the past three-four years and DAVID&#8217;s database was too old to capture them. Things do not seem so bad for protein-coding genes, as we only lost 6.4%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"504\" height=\"306\" src=\"http:\/\/192.231.106.19\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/00da1-entrezid.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-33\" srcset=\"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/00da1-entrezid.png 504w, https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/00da1-entrezid-300x182.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 504px) 100vw, 504px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Second, we&nbsp;repeated the same experiment using the primary gene symbols (ignoring synonyms), and we chose to only focus on protein-coding genes.&nbsp; Among these 20921 symbols, DAVID failed to recognize 12.6%. &nbsp;Just to name a few,&nbsp;DXO, CTSV, ACKR1, MYCL, PKM, MYRF, etc.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"658\" height=\"312\" src=\"http:\/\/192.231.106.19\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/7c01e-pie-1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-36\" srcset=\"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/7c01e-pie-1.png 658w, https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/7c01e-pie-1-300x142.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 658px) 100vw, 658px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Third, the same experiment with high-quality protein coding NM_* RefSeq entries shows DAVID missed 31.5% of the human transcriptome!Our tests demonstrate DAVID is seriously aged. &nbsp;We all spend tremendous amount of resource in obtaining our gene list, why should we compromise our discoveries by using a six-year old resource? This is why we created&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/metascape.org\/\">Metascape<\/a>&nbsp;as a DAVID replacement. &nbsp;Metascape always keep its data source fresh, try it today!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[This is an old blog written on Tuesday, February 9, 2016] National Cancer Institute&#8217;s&nbsp;DAVID&nbsp;provides a set of popular bioinformatics tools that help biologists make sense of a list of gene.&nbsp; However, evidences show that DAVID has not bee updated since &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/?p=16\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[17,21,22],"class_list":["post-16","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comment","tag-database","tag-david","tag-outdated"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":77,"href":"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16\/revisions\/77"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/metascape.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}